In re the Application of Kiepura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Application of Kiepura

89 A.D.2d 1033, 454 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18296

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 13, 1982·Published

Opinion

Application for reinstatement. In May, 1980, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until further order. The instant application for reinstatement was referred to the Committee on Professional Standards for investigation. The committee has reported that petitioner has complied in all respects with the order of suspension and that his conduct during the period of suspension has been good. Application granted and petitioner reinstated effective immediately. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for reinstatement. In May, 1980, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until further order. The instant application for reinstatement was referred to the Committee on Professional Standards for investigation. The committee has reported that petitioner has complied in all respects with the order of suspension and that his conduct during the period of suspension has been good. Application granted and petitioner reinstated effective immediately. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.

In re the Application of Kiepura, 89 A.D.2d 1033, 454 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

89 A.D.2d 1033 (In re the Application of Kiepura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.