In re the Application for the Removal from Office of Reidulski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Application for the Removal from Office of Reidulski

257 A.D. 962, 12 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 962 (In re the Application for the Removal from Office of Reidulski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Application for the Removal from Office of Reidulski, 257 A.D. 962, 12 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding instituted by citizens pursuant to the provisions of Public Officers Law, section 36, for the removal of the respondent from the office of constable of the town of New Windsor, Orange county, New York. The respondent, a layman unlearned in the law, violated its form in the presentation of the questioned bill for services in the sum of five dollars. Nevertheless it is unquestioned that at the direction of a justice of the peace he rendered actual service which was the basis cf his charges. In the circumstances, the infliction of the drastic penalty of removal from office is not warranted. Proceeding dismissed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding instituted by citizens pursuant to the provisions of Public Officers Law, section 36, for the removal of the respondent from the office of constable of the town of New Windsor, Orange county, New York. The respondent, a layman unlearned in the law, violated its form in the presentation of the questioned bill for services in the sum of five dollars. Nevertheless it is unquestioned that at the direction of a justice of the peace he rendered actual service which was the basis cf his charges. In the circumstances, the infliction of the drastic penalty of removal from office is not warranted. Proceeding dismissed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 962, 12 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-for-the-removal-from-office-of-reidulski-nyappdiv-1939.