In Re the Application for the Guardianship of Elmer
4 A.2d 387, 125 N.J. Eq. 148, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 642
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Grosman.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trencharb, Case, Bobine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Application for the Guardianship of Elmer, 4 A.2d 387, 125 N.J. Eq. 148, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 642 (N.J. 1939).
4 A.2d 387 (In Re the Application for the Guardianship of Elmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re B.R.F.
669 S.W.2d 240 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)
Kubon v. Kubon
331 P.2d 636 (California Supreme Court, 1958)
In Re Hoppe
108 A.2d 664 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
State Ex Rel. Hockenhull v. Marshall
270 P.2d 702 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1954)
Link v. Link
262 S.W.2d 318 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1953)
Gardner v. Hall
26 A.2d 799 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)