In re the Application for Support, Education & to Establish the Paternity of a Child Born Out of Wedlock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Application for Support, Education & to Establish the Paternity of a Child Born Out of Wedlock

254 A.D. 776, 4 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7565

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 776 (In re the Application for Support, Education & to Establish the Paternity of a Child Born Out of Wedlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Application for Support, Education & to Establish the Paternity of a Child Born Out of Wedlock, 254 A.D. 776, 4 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Children’s Court of the County of Nassau, which decreed that the appellant was the father of a child born to the complainant on July 28, 1937, and directed that the appellant pay the sum of forty dollars for confinement expenses, five dollars weekly for the support and maintenance of said child, and seventy-five dollars in case of death, unanimously affirmed. While we are of opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting in evidence the result of the blood grouping test over appellant’s objection, the error was harmless, since the order is amply supported by the testimony under the version of' the relationship given either by the complainant or by the appellant. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Children’s Court of the County of Nassau, which decreed that the appellant was the father of a child born to the complainant on July 28, 1937, and directed that the appellant pay the sum of forty dollars for confinement expenses, five dollars weekly for the support and maintenance of said child, and seventy-five dollars in case of death, unanimously affirmed. While we are of opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting in evidence the result of the blood grouping test over appellant’s objection, the error was harmless, since the order is amply supported by the testimony under the version of' the relationship given either by the complainant or by the appellant. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 776, 4 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-for-support-education-to-establish-the-paternity-nyappdiv-1938.