In re the Application for Removal of Barby
This text of 230 A.D. 775 (In re the Application for Removal of Barby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of County Court and judgment of City Court reversed on the law and a new trial granted in the City Court, with costs in all courts to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the court erred in refusing to permit plaintiff to prove the facts alleged in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of the answer to the effect that he had made an oral agreement with defendant supplemental to the lease by which he was to have an adjustment on the rent for certain large sums of money spent by him to make the premises fit for his occupancy. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-for-removal-of-barby-nyappdiv-1930.