In re the application for probate of the alleged last will & testament of Buckman

85 A. 246, 80 N.J. Eq. 556, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 347
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 18, 1912·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree of the prerogative court will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion delivered in the orphans court.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhbes, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Treacy—13.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the application for probate of the alleged last will & testament of Buckman, 85 A. 246, 80 N.J. Eq. 556, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 347 (N.J. 1912).

85 A. 246 (In re the application for probate of the alleged last will & testament of Buckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna Filo
75 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re Phillips
50 A.2d 862 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1947)
In Re Rule
5 A.2d 64 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1939)