In re the Application for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Seibert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Application for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Seibert

261 A.D. 867, 24 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 867 (In re the Application for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Seibert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Application for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Seibert, 261 A.D. 867, 24 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the Buffalo Evening News from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which affirmed a decision of an Unemployment Insurance Referee holding that claimant was an employee of appellant and entitled to unemployment insurance benefits. The sole question is whether claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. The question is one of fact and there is evidence to sustain the decision appealed from. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the Buffalo Evening News from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which affirmed a decision of an Unemployment Insurance Referee holding that claimant was an employee of appellant and entitled to unemployment insurance benefits. The sole question is whether claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. The question is one of fact and there is evidence to sustain the decision appealed from. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 867, 24 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-for-benefits-under-article-18-of-the-labor-law-made-nyappdiv-1941.