In re the American Surety Co.
This text of 19 Jones & S. 531 (In re the American Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rule asked is substantially a repetition of the statute on the subject, and this statute has now been so often construed in cases reported, that a rule is not needed for the practical application of the statute. If there should be, the opinion of the court being that there is not anything in a rule of the kind which might be intended to direct what the court at special, term should do in each particular litigation, such a rule would contravene the statute which intends that each application shall be passed upon on its own merits after hearing both sides.
The application should be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Jones & S. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-american-surety-co-nysuperctnyc-1885.