In re the Adoption of Sanchez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re the Adoption of Sanchez

556 So. 2d 28, 1990 La. LEXIS 8, 1990 WL 662

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 5, 1990

DocketNo. 89-CC-2830

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 28 (In re the Adoption of Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Adoption of Sanchez, 556 So. 2d 28, 1990 La. LEXIS 8, 1990 WL 662 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Sanchez, Audrey; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, Div. “C”, No. A-18483-C; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CA-1605.

Granted. The case is remanded to the juvenile court with instructions to allow relator to file an amended petition setting out the facts alleged in her affidavit and to determine whether the cousin’s obtaining the judgment of adoption, without disclosing to the court the grandmother’s custody of the child’s siblings and her desire for custody of this child, (facts which allegedly were also known by the Office of Family [29]*29Services), was an ill practice under the cir-cumstanees.

WATSON, J., dissents from the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sanchez, Audrey; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, Div. “C”, No. A-18483-C; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CA-1605.

Granted. The case is remanded to the juvenile court with instructions to allow relator to file an amended petition setting out the facts alleged in her affidavit and to determine whether the cousin’s obtaining the judgment of adoption, without disclosing to the court the grandmother’s custody of the child’s siblings and her desire for custody of this child, (facts which allegedly were also known by the Office of Family [29]*29Services), was an ill practice under the cir-cumstanees.

WATSON, J., dissents from the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 28, 1990 La. LEXIS 8, 1990 WL 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-adoption-of-sanchez-la-1990.