In re the Adoption of Martin

268 A.D. 1069, 52 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 1069 (In re the Adoption of Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Adoption of Martin, 268 A.D. 1069, 52 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

In an adoption proceeding, the natural mother of the infant sought to be adopted appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, which overruled her objections and granted the petition for adoption. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition denied, without costs. In our opinion respondents failed to establish such an abandonment of the infant by its natural mother as authorized the order of adoption, in the absence of the mother’s consent thereto. (Domestic Relations Law, § 111.) The instrument executed and acknowledged by her at the time the infant was surrendered to them was not the consent contemplated by section 112 of the statute. The moral and temporal welfare of the infant may not be here considered, and we express no opinion on that subject or on the question of the infant’s custody. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Lewis, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Adoption of an Anonymous Child
192 Misc. 359 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1948)
In re the Adoption of Trisko
269 A.D. 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 1069, 52 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-adoption-of-martin-nyappdiv-1945.