In re the Adoption of K.L.H.

541 So. 2d 180, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2000, 1989 WL 36276
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1989·No. No. 88-2010·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the trial court’s order which reaffirmed the final judgment of adoption. The so-called “consent” was neither properly sworn nor executed within the presence of the notary. It contained an acknowledgment, not a jurat, as required in a sworn document. See Neff v. Adler, 416 So.2d 1240, 1241 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

[181]*181GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER, JJ., and ROBINSON, STEVEN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Adoption of K.L.H., 541 So. 2d 180, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2000, 1989 WL 36276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

541 So. 2d 180 (In re the Adoption of K.L.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neff v. Adler
416 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)