In re the Adoption of J.M.L.
This text of 2011 UT App 405 (In re the Adoption of J.M.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION
T1 G.W.M. (Grandfather) seeks to appeal the trial court's order denying his petition to adopt J.M.L. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on lack of jurisdiction due to an untimely filed notice of appeal.
T2 Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the order or judgment appealed. See Utah R.App. P. 4(a). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. See Serrato v. Utah Transit Auth., 2000 UT App 299, ¶ 7, 13 P.3d 616. If an appeal is not timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss it. See Bradbury v. Valencia, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 8, 5 P.3d 649.
13 The trial court entered its order on June 21, 2011. Grandfather filed his notice of appeal on August 22, 2011, more than thirty days after the entry of the order. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was untimely filed,1 and this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See id.
'I 4 Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 UT App 405, 266 P.3d 209, 2011 WL 6000711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-adoption-of-jml-utahctapp-2011.