In Re the Adoption of J

372 A.2d 607, 73 N.J. 68, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 180
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 16, 1977·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed and the judgment of the Essex County Court is reinstated substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Crahay, reported at 139 N. J. Super. 533. 1

*69 Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal —■ Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Clifford and Judge Conford — 4.

For affirmance ■ — • Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Pashman and Schreiber — 3.

1

Headnote taken from dissenting opinion of Judge Crahay reported at 354 A. 2d 668.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Adoption of J, 372 A.2d 607, 73 N.J. 68, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1977).

372 A.2d 607 (In Re the Adoption of J) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. JOE R.
923 P.2d 1169 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1996)
Matter of Adoption of Children by Las
610 A.2d 925 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Matter of Adoption of Benigno-White
537 A.2d 1345 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Bartasavich v. Mitchell
471 A.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Matter of Adoption of Doe
657 P.2d 134 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)
In Re Adoption of Child by IT and KT
397 A.2d 341 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
J. and E. v. M. and F.
385 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Sees v. Baber
377 A.2d 628 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)