In re the Adoption of Gaskins

318 So. 2d 165
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1975·No. No. 75-94·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the lower court granting a petition for adoption finding that such adoption is in the best interest of the child arrives at the appellate level with a presumption of correctness; absent a showing of a lack of competent substantial evidence to support the decree, the decision will not be reversed. Smith v. Lyst, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 921. It is impossible for this court to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion because of the absence of a transcript of testimony upon which the trial court findings were based. Royal Flair, Inc. v. Cape Coral Bank, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 895.1 Accordingly, by reason of the foregoing the final judgment of adoption is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Adoption of Gaskins, 318 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

318 So. 2d 165 (In re the Adoption of Gaskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DARRYL ANTONIO MACK v. JENNIFER HOFFMAN
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
Ramey v. Thomas
483 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)