In re the Adoption of A.C.R.
467 So. 2d 434, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 949, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13411
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1985·No. No. 84-2362·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Kenneth Bryson, appeals the trial court’s order entered in favor of appel-lees, Camille Reynolds and James Larkin Reynolds, holding that the adoption agreement entered into between the parties was valid. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, we find that there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the trial court. Friedman v. U.S. Home Corp., 452 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); In re Estate of Rodgers, 149 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).
Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Adoption of A.C.R., 467 So. 2d 434, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 949, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
467 So. 2d 434 (In re the Adoption of A.C.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barry v. State
467 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)