In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Remlinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Remlinger

258 A.D. 911, 16 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 911 (In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Remlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Administration of the Goods, Chattels & Credits of Remlinger, 258 A.D. 911, 16 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, granting respondent’s application for letters of administration and dismissing objections based on the allegations that respondent had abandoned the deceased, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. By his failure to offer proper objection, the appellant acquiesced in the reception of respondent’s testimony as to personal transactions with the deceased. The conclusion that there was no abandonment was supported by the evidence. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, granting respondent’s application for letters of administration and dismissing objections based on the allegations that respondent had abandoned the deceased, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. By his failure to offer proper objection, the appellant acquiesced in the reception of respondent’s testimony as to personal transactions with the deceased. The conclusion that there was no abandonment was supported by the evidence. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 911, 16 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-administration-of-the-goods-chattels-credits-of-remlinger-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack