In re the Accounting of Zalewski
265 A.D. 878, 38 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6293
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The Consul was not entitled by virtue of his status at common law or the provisions of an existent treaty to exercise a right which was personal to the widow. The office of the Consul is no more extensive in that respect than that of a committee of an incompetent. (See Matter of Hills, 264 N. Y. 349, 353; Matter of Brown, 212 App. Div. 677, 679.) Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [177 Misc. 384.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Accounting of Zalewski, 265 A.D. 878, 38 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 878 (In re the Accounting of Zalewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re McCourt
12 B.R. 587 (S.D. New York, 1981)