In Re the Accounting of Wilson
139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 573, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1300
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division in so far as it reverses decision of the Surrogate’s Court reversed and decision of Surrogate’s Court affirmed, with costs in this court and Appellate Division, on dissenting opinion of Clark, J., below.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Wilson, 139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 573, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1300 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 739 (In Re the Accounting of Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.