In re the Accounting of Williams

192 Misc. 555, 80 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2592
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided February 6, 1948·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

In this accounting proceeding the law applicable to. the distribution of the proceeds of a wrongful death action which arose in a foreign jurisdiction must be determined. [556]*556Deceased was a resident of this county and State. Site died in an automobile accident in New Hampshire. She left surviving her a husband and an infant dependent child who is issue of a prior marriage of deceased. The New Hampshire death action statute differs from our own in that it directs distribution of the proceeds of such action one half to a surviving spouse and one half to minor and dependent issue when both spouse and such issue survive.

The question here presented is whether the proceeds of the action for causing the wrongful death of deceased are to be distributed under the law of New York or under that of New Hampshire. It is settled that such proceeds must be distributed in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction where the cause of action arose (Slater v. Mexican Nat. R. R. Co., 194 U. S. 120; Loucks v. Standard Oil Co. of N. Y., 224 N. Y. 99; Kiefer v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 12 App. Div. 28, affd. 153 N. Y. 688; Matter of Petrasek, 191 Misc. 9). Here the proceeds are distributable under the laws of the State of New Hampshire. The attorney’s fees are allowed in the amount requested.

Submit, on notice, decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Accounting of Williams, 192 Misc. 555, 80 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2592 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1948).

192 Misc. 555 (In re the Accounting of Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. Capital Airlines, Inc.
42 Misc. 2d 194 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
In re the Estate of Hausvik
23 Misc. 2d 108 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Estate of Vogel
12 Misc. 2d 237 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Accounting of Smulowitz
208 Misc. 1078 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1955)
In re the Accounting of Dimirsky
201 Misc. 118 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1951)