In re the Accounting of the Public Administrator

28 Misc. 2d 278, 217 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2603
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided July 12, 1961·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Maximilian Moss, S.

Persons who are nationals of Poland and reside there have been named beneficiaries of certain bequests in various wills of American citizens residing here. Applications have been made to this court for the transfer of such bequests to the Polish nationals residing in Poland.

Under the provisions of section 269-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, where it appears to the court that one entitled to [279] a legacy would not have the benefit, use or control of the money or other property left him, the court may decree that such money or property be deposited with the City Treasurer to the credit of such legatee or beneficiary, where it remains as an interest bearing account, subject to the further order of the court.

It has been the general practice of this court not to permit the transfer of bequests to persons residing in countries behind the “iron curtain ” in the belief that such persons would not have the full benefit, use, control and enjoyment of the funds, by reason of excessive taxation, unfavorable currency restrictions, or other governmental controls which would in effect deny the foreign beneficiary the right to convert the funds at full value, without limitation or reservation.

As a result of representations made to this court by the Consul General at Washington of the Polish People’s Republic, that the situation in Poland was different from that generally believed, this court in an effort to do full justice to the many individuals residing in Poland who have been left bequests by relatives and friends here, on its own initiative and at its own expense visited Poland for an on the spot investigation of the situation. In connection therewith, the Surrogate conferred with the Ambassador of the United States to Poland at Warsaw, the Secretary to the Embassy and the American Consul, with members of the Association des Juris tes Polonais, members of the Bar Association of Warsaw, the Director-General of the Ministry of Finance, members of the staff of the Ministry of Finance and their Counsel, chiefs of divisions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Chairman, officers and members of the Board of Directors of Bank Polska Kasa Opieki and their General Counsel, and others.. The Surrogate also spent considerable time at the principal office of Bank Polska Kasa Opieki during the banking hours.

Prior to his visit to Poland, the Surrogate had been informed that Poland had an inheritance tax law which severely taxed funds coining into Poland from foreign sources. The Surrogate found that it was true that an inheritance tax law existed but that what was generally overlooked was subdivision 6 thereof which “ exempted ” from taxation inheritances from foreign lands. Upon demand of written proof, the court was supplied with Law Register or Journal No. 9 of February 19, 1951 which contained a decree of February 3, 1947 “ Concerning Tax on the Acquisition of Property Rights ”. Article 4 óf the decree contains nine subdivisions of property rights which are not subject to taxation. The subdivision affecting [280] the exemption from tax of inheritances is subdivision “6”, contained on page 84 of the said Law Register or Journal. A translation of the law furnished the court by the American Embassy is as follows: Decree of February 3, 1947, Title I, Article 4.

‘ ‘ Exempt from taxation is the unobligation acquisition of: * * * “6) Foreign currencies or foreign drafts located abroad and subsequently transferred to Poland, including foreign means of payment constituting the process of the sale of property acquired without obligation.”

It was further explained as follows: If one buys property abroad and then sells it, or buys foreign currency abroad and then attempts to import it, the tax is applied; but if one acquires the property or currency without incurring any obligation, e.g. as a gift or inheritance, then it is tax-exempt.”

Substantially similar interpretations were received from Polish scholars and persons of Polish ancestry residing in the United States.

Although the court was notified from the foregoing that foreign inheritances were tax-exempt, still it was possible that currency or foreign exchange regulations might conceivably take such a large bite out of the inheritances when the funds were received in Poland, that the tax exemption would prove of little value. The court therefore had to determine whether Polish nationals receiving estate funds from the United States could convert such funds at full value in Poland, without deductions.

With respect to the latter, the court found that special facilities for remittances from the United States were available through the Bank Polska ICasa Opieki, popularly known as the PKO bank. Using these facilities, Polish nationals residing in Poland receiving inheritances, gifts, support payments, etc., may receive dollars from bank PKO through the medium of purchasing merchandise from the bank. Prices of the goods sold by the bank are calculated on the basis of retail prices prevailing in the United States. This merchandise may be used by the individual or may be legally sold at least once to a third party. If the goods are not wanted, a certificate for the goods or of its value is given by the bank and the bank has advised this court that if requested, it could arrange its immediate negotiation in which event the bank would credit the holder of the certificate with Polish zlotys calculated on a preferential basis. The ratio between the United States dollar value of an order and the amount of zlotys received by the recipient, when he sells or negotiates the transfer of the merchandise, depends on the current retail market price of the merchandise prevailing in [281] the United States. This usually results in a preferential return of about 72 zlotys for the dollar. Thus a return would be realized in Polish currency which considerably exceeds the sum which would have been obtained at official exchange rates through the use of ordinary dollar remittance channels. The normal basic rate of exchange is 4 zlotys per U. S. dollar and the special rate of exchange applicable to certain situations is 24 zlotys per U. S. dollar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Accounting of the Public Administrator, 28 Misc. 2d 278, 217 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2603 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

28 Misc. 2d 278 (In re the Accounting of the Public Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Kraszewski
55 Misc. 2d 10 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1967)
In re the Estate of Krasowski
28 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
In re the Estate of Sikorski
54 Misc. 2d 883 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1967)
In re the Estate of Kina
49 Misc. 2d 598 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
Blaskiewicz v. Ryter
199 A.2d 568 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1964)
Tebin v. Moldock
19 A.D.2d 275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
In re the Estate of Samolewicz
38 Misc. 2d 420 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
In re the Estate of Moore
33 Misc. 2d 1060 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
In re the Accounting of Seaman
29 Misc. 2d 480 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)