In Re the Accounting of Sire

111 N.E. 1098, 217 N.Y. 607, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1358
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1916·Published

Opinion

Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Sire, 111 N.E. 1098, 217 N.Y. 607, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1358 (N.Y. 1916).

111 N.E. 1098 (In Re the Accounting of Sire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.