In Re the Accounting of Silkman
83 N.E. 1128, 190 N.Y. 560, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1219
Opinion
Jndgment affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Silkman, 83 N.E. 1128, 190 N.Y. 560, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1219 (N.Y. 1908).
83 N.E. 1128 (In Re the Accounting of Silkman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan Bank
30 Misc. 2d 743 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)
In re the Estate of Kohn
26 Misc. 2d 659 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)
Bettendorf v. Bettendorf
190 Iowa 83 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)