In Re the Accounting of Runk

120 N.E. 875, 224 N.Y. 570, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 954
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1918·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

■ Concur: Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: His cock, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Runk, 120 N.E. 875, 224 N.Y. 570, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 954 (N.Y. 1918).

120 N.E. 875 (In Re the Accounting of Runk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Parkinson
138 Misc. 2d 1069 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1988)
In re the Estate of Saphir
73 Misc. 2d 907 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1973)
In re the Estate of Newins
33 Misc. 2d 72 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1962)
Estate of Thompson
328 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1958)
Higbee v. Schwartz
185 Misc. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
In re the Estate of Viggiani
171 Misc. 74 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
In re the Estate of Wendel
159 Misc. 900 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Morin
136 Misc. 823 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1930)
In Re. Norris' Estate
150 S.E. 693 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Dailey Bros. v. W. A. Clements Co.
120 Misc. 310 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)