In Re the Accounting of Quick

123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 626, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 987
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 22, 1919·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Quick, 123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 626, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 987 (N.Y. 1919).

123 N.E. 886 (In Re the Accounting of Quick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.