In Re the Accounting of Potter
16 N.E.2d 93, 278 N.Y. 534, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1383
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to each party appearing by separate attorney and filing a brief payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Potter, 16 N.E.2d 93, 278 N.Y. 534, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1383 (N.Y. 1938).
16 N.E.2d 93 (In Re the Accounting of Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Jackson
47 Misc. 2d 931 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
Speyers v. Manchester
41 A.2d 783 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1945)
In re the Estate of Rubin
168 Misc. 81 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)