In re the Accounting of Poersch
This text of 27 A.D.2d 958 (In re the Accounting of Poersch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hotion to strike respondents’ appendix denied as premature, without costs and without prejudice to its renewal after settlement of the transcript and record on appeal. (Rules of Appellate Division, Third Department, rule 2, subd. [e].) Cross motions to dismiss appeals denied, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 958, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-poersch-nyappdiv-1967.