In re the Accounting of Poersch
216 N.E.2d 834, 17 N.Y.2d 721, 269 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1484
This text of 216 N.E.2d 834 (In re the Accounting of Poersch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Poersch, 216 N.E.2d 834, 17 N.Y.2d 721, 269 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1484 (N.Y. 1966).
Opinion
Motion by appellants Gertrude E. Kelliher, Arthur J. Bigley, Edith Bigley, Alfred Bigley, Vincent Bigley, Ronald Bigley, Betty Bigley, Edward Bigley and Ellen Bigley for (1) leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, (2) reargument of the motion to dismiss the appeal [see 17 N Y 2d 611], (3) certification of a constitutional question, and (4) a stay, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
216 N.E.2d 834, 17 N.Y.2d 721, 269 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-poersch-ny-1966.