In re the Accounting of Oakes

274 A.D. 867, 81 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3731
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 867 (In re the Accounting of Oakes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Oakes, 274 A.D. 867, 81 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order of Supreme Court granted in the above-entitled proceeding on December 22, 1947, and filed in the office of the Clerk of the County of St. Lawrence on the 20th day of January, 1948, awarding Clifford A. Oakes, as committee, the sum of $1,000 as additional allowance for services rendered to the estate of the incompetent on an intermediate accounting. It appears that the committee had been acting as committee for the incompetent veteran for slightly under twenty-five and one-half years. At the time he was appointed the incompetent had no assets but thereafter from February 14, 1922, to July 1, 1947, the committee received $43,846. Of this sum $32,100.45 represented. moneys received from the United States Government and $1,968.50 represented moneys received for Federal bonus. The balance of funds in the estate at the time of the accounting was in the sum of $19,388.21, consisting of $17,307.25 in investments and $2,080.96 in cash. The committee invested some of this money in real estate mortgages and personally examined and appraised the property; he also checked the financial status of borrowers and examined real estate records with reference to title to properties; he also investigated a large number of public loans throughout various towns; kept track of payments of taxes, insurance and collected payments on the loans themselves. The evidence shows he performed numerous other services. We are of the opinion that the extra allowance of $1,000 was justified pursuant to section 1384-k of the Civil Practice Act as amended by chapter 201 of the Laws of 1939, and that the order granting such allowance should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Guardianship of W.J.
9 Misc. 3d 657 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 867, 81 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-oakes-nyappdiv-1948.