In Re the Accounting of Mulligan

111 N.E. 1092, 216 N.Y. 720, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 940
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 1915·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs against the executrix personally; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Not sitting: His-cock, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Mulligan, 111 N.E. 1092, 216 N.Y. 720, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 940 (N.Y. 1915).

111 N.E. 1092 (In Re the Accounting of Mulligan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.