In re the Accounting of Mount Vernon Trust Co.

267 A.D. 783, 45 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236

This text of 267 A.D. 783 (In re the Accounting of Mount Vernon Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Mount Vernon Trust Co., 267 A.D. 783, 45 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Appeal by a testamentary trustee from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, as surcharged the trustee for negligence in retaining in the trust fund certain guaranteed mortgage certificates in violation of the directions of the testator as expressed in his will, and from an order denying the trustee’s motion that the Surrogate file an amended opinion and decision showing the grounds or basis of the property values which he found. Decree and order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondent Harold D. Toomey, as special guardian for Muriel Joan Campbell, payable by the trustee and not out of the estate. The Surrogate’s holding that the appellant was negligent in its conduct as trustee was proper. The appellant’s contentions to the contrary are unimpressive. In determining the values of the mortgaged properties, the Surrogate was not bound by the opinion evidence of any of the experts who testified, hut was entitled to form an independent judgment upon the factual evidence relating to the properties. (Roberts v. N. T. E. B. B. Co., 128 N. T. 455, 464, 465; Kelly v. Wills, 116 App. Div. 758, 761; Harley v. Buffalo Car Mfg. Co., 142 N. T. 31, 37; Brooklyn Heights B. B. Co. v. Brooklyn City B. B. Co., 124 App. Div. 896, 901, 902.) The decision of the Surrogate as to values is adequate and finds abundant support in the evidence, and he was not required to make further findings on the application of the trustee. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 71.) Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Adel, JJ.; Taylor, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. Wills
116 A.D. 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Brooklyn Heights Railroad v. Brooklyn City Railroad
124 A.D. 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D. 783, 45 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-mount-vernon-trust-co-nyappdiv-1943.