In re the Accounting of Molloy
278 A.D. 797, 104 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4773
Opinion
Decree appealed from unanimously dismissed, with costs to the respondent, upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely served (People ex ret Manhattan Stor. <& Warehouse Co. V. Lilly, 299 N. Y. 281). Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and McCurn, JJ. [See post, pp. 935, 941.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Accounting of Molloy, 278 A.D. 797, 104 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
278 A.D. 797 (In re the Accounting of Molloy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People Ex Rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Lilly
86 N.E.2d 747 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)