In Re the Accounting of Meyer

74 N.E. 1120, 181 N.Y. 562, 19 Bedell 562, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 872
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.-

Concur: Gbay, O’Bbien, Haight, Vann'and Webneb, JJ., and Babtlett, J., on the ground that the executors and trustees were justified in executing the McGill agreement and continuing that business; but is unable to concur that the charges of interest against the four beneficiaries under the will, as made by the referee and adopted by the surrogate, were proper. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Meyer, 74 N.E. 1120, 181 N.Y. 562, 19 Bedell 562, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 872 (N.Y. 1905).

74 N.E. 1120 (In Re the Accounting of Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Andrus
85 Misc. 2d 1062 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1976)