In Re the Accounting of Meyer

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Accounting of Meyer

74 N.E. 1120, 181 N.Y. 562, 19 Bedell 562, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 872

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 2, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 N.E. 1120 (In Re the Accounting of Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Accounting of Meyer, 74 N.E. 1120, 181 N.Y. 562, 19 Bedell 562, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 872 (N.Y. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.-

Concur: Gbay, O’Bbien, Haight, Vann'and Webneb, JJ., and Babtlett, J., on the ground that the executors and trustees were justified in executing the McGill agreement and continuing that business; but is unable to concur that the charges of interest against the four beneficiaries under the will, as made by the referee and adopted by the surrogate, were proper. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.-

Concur: Gbay, O’Bbien, Haight, Vann'and Webneb, JJ., and Babtlett, J., on the ground that the executors and trustees were justified in executing the McGill agreement and continuing that business; but is unable to concur that the charges of interest against the four beneficiaries under the will, as made by the referee and adopted by the surrogate, were proper. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 N.E. 1120, 181 N.Y. 562, 19 Bedell 562, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-meyer-ny-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack