In re the Accounting of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.

83 A.D.2d 808, 442 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15163
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 13, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 808 (In re the Accounting of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 83 A.D.2d 808, 442 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Wallach, J.), entered February 3, 1981, appointing a guardian ad litem for the infant respondents, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the natural father’s notice of appearance reinstated and the appointment of a guardian ad litem vacated. The record discloses that the father has no interest adverse to those of the infants in either of the two trusts as to which this intermediate accounting proceeding is brought. That he is married to one of the accounting parties, the mother of the infants, is not a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that a conflict exists. The father has been shown to be duly qualified and capable. “CPLR 1201 and 1202, effecting a change from the practice under the Civil Practice Act, indicates the legislative preference for the appearance of the natural guardian”. (Matter of Legget, 25 AD2d 727, 728.) It is the policy of this State to encourage parents to act as guardians, thereby avoiding unnecessary appointments and the expense of a guardian ad litem. (United States v Noble, 269 F Supp 814, 816.) While the father may have “reviewed the statements of transactions furnished by the trustees” and “monitored the trust *** since [his] marriage”, there is not the slightest suggestion that he has made any decisions affecting the trusts. No conflict is shown. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re George Green and Garlan Green
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
In re the Estate of Betz
74 A.D.3d 1459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Mazzuca v. Warren P. Wielt Trust
59 A.D.3d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Palmiere
284 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Stahl v. Rhee
220 A.D.2d 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Davenport v. Garcia
834 S.W.2d 4 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Sutherland v. City of New York
107 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.2d 808, 442 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-manufacturers-hanover-trust-co-nyappdiv-1981.