In re the Accounting of Lewis

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Accounting of Lewis

200 Misc. 1105, 110 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2391

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 Misc. 1105 (In re the Accounting of Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Accounting of Lewis, 200 Misc. 1105, 110 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2391 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Rubenstein, S.

The administrator seeks approval of the compromise of an action for wrongful death and personal injuries of decedent; the fixation of the compensation of the attorney for services rendered to the estate; determination of the proper distribution of the net estate; authorization to pay the balance of the funeral bill, hospital expenses and reimbursement of $100 to the administrator for money advanced to the estate and retention of the sum of $500 subject to further account.

The distributees are four sons and two daughters of decedent, all of whom are of full age and competent. The decedent died on April 17,1947, prior to the effective date of section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law, as amended. The compromise is approved and the net proceeds are to be distributed equally to decedent’s six children. The administrator is authorized to pay the balance of the funeral bill, the hospital bill and reimburse himself for the $100 advanced to the estate. The administrator’s request to hold $500 of the proceeds of the recovery subject to further account is denied, since no reason has been advanced therefor.

The agreement of retainer made by the administrator provided for payment to the attorney of 45% of the recovery had in the action. Two of the distributees have not filed any consent to the fixation of the attorney’s fee. The other four distributees have executed duly acknowledged consents to the allowance of the attorney’s fee as requested. As to the consenting distributees, their shares will be governed by said retainer (Ledyard v. Bull, 119 N. Y. 62, 75; Matter of Smith, 169 Misc. 615, 617; Matter of Shapiro, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 28, 1952, p. 373, col. 4; Matter of Brennan, N. Y. L. J., March 23, 1951, p. 1056, col. 5).

As to the distributees who have not consented, the retainer agreement is subject to the power of the court to determine a reasonable compensation to the attorney (Matter of Meng, 227 N. Y. 264, 269; Decedent Estate Law, § 133; Surrogate’s Court Act, § 231-a). The compensation of the attorney is fixed at 33%% of the shares of the nonconsenting distributees.

Compensation as fixed herein shall include all services to and including the entry of the final decree settling the administrator’s account and distribution thereunder.

Submit decree, on notice, accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rubenstein, S.

The administrator seeks approval of the compromise of an action for wrongful death and personal injuries of decedent; the fixation of the compensation of the attorney for services rendered to the estate; determination of the proper distribution of the net estate; authorization to pay the balance of the funeral bill, hospital expenses and reimbursement of $100 to the administrator for money advanced to the estate and retention of the sum of $500 subject to further account.

The distributees are four sons and two daughters of decedent, all of whom are of full age and competent. The decedent died on April 17,1947, prior to the effective date of section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law, as amended. The compromise is approved and the net proceeds are to be distributed equally to decedent’s six children. The administrator is authorized to pay the balance of the funeral bill, the hospital bill and reimburse himself for the $100 advanced to the estate. The administrator’s request to hold $500 of the proceeds of the recovery subject to further account is denied, since no reason has been advanced therefor.

The agreement of retainer made by the administrator provided for payment to the attorney of 45% of the recovery had in the action. Two of the distributees have not filed any consent to the fixation of the attorney’s fee. The other four distributees have executed duly acknowledged consents to the allowance of the attorney’s fee as requested. As to the consenting distributees, their shares will be governed by said retainer (Ledyard v. Bull, 119 N. Y. 62, 75; Matter of Smith, 169 Misc. 615, 617; Matter of Shapiro, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 28, 1952, p. 373, col. 4; Matter of Brennan, N. Y. L. J., March 23, 1951, p. 1056, col. 5).

As to the distributees who have not consented, the retainer agreement is subject to the power of the court to determine a reasonable compensation to the attorney (Matter of Meng, 227 N. Y. 264, 269; Decedent Estate Law, § 133; Surrogate’s Court Act, § 231-a). The compensation of the attorney is fixed at 33%% of the shares of the nonconsenting distributees.

Compensation as fixed herein shall include all services to and including the entry of the final decree settling the administrator’s account and distribution thereunder.

Submit decree, on notice, accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 Misc. 1105, 110 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-lewis-nysurct-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack