In re the Accounting of Lazar

24 A.D.2d 93, 263 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 93 (In re the Accounting of Lazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Lazar, 24 A.D.2d 93, 263 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon settlement of the final account of the committee of the person and property of an incompetent, hospitalized veteran, the committee, an attorney, has been awarded $450 for legal services, and compensation of $350 has been granted 'the guardian ad litem. Appellant, the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, contends that the former of these allowances should be eliminated and the latter reduced. We agree.

The committee was substituted for a prior committee on January 24, 1957. His petition shows receipts of $7,698.36, including $3,945.22 received from his predecessor, disbursements of $5,991.77, and a balance on hand of $1,706.59, As all the receipts consisted of pension payments by the United States Veterans’ Administration and of income derived from such payments, the committee’s compensation is regulated by subdivision 1 of section 115-j of the Mental Hygiene Law. That subdivision, after providing that the compensation ‘1 for administering the estate of a ward shall be fixed by the court not to exceed five per centum of the income of the ward during any year ”, goes on to say: “ In the event of extraordinary services rendered by such guardian [i.e., the committee] the court may, upon petition and after hearing thereon, authorize additional compensation therefor, payable from the estate of the ward.”

It is not questioned that the committee herein performed legal services which might justify reward if other statutes relating to committee compensation were applicable (see Mental Hygiene Law, §§ 109, 115-j, subd. 2; Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 285). But ■as Matter of Erlandsen (265 N. Y. 155) makes plain, such other statutes, in the respect here concerned, have by virtue of section 115-a of the Mental Hygiene Law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Guardianship of W.J.
9 Misc. 3d 657 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 93, 263 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-lazar-nyappdiv-1965.