In re the Accounting of Langone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Accounting of Langone

1 A.D.2d 676, 146 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 676 (In re the Accounting of Langone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Accounting of Langone, 1 A.D.2d 676, 146 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to settle the account of a successor executor in the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, an order was made on his motion, striking from the account the items relating to real estate and the management of real estate, and striking out the objections made to such items, on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction in respect of such issues. The decedent’s residuary estate, including his real property, vested in the devisees. After his appointment, the successor executor collected the rents, paid the expenses, and otherwise managed the real property. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to all parties filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate, and motion denied. The successor executor had the power to manage the real property notwithstanding that title thereto had vested in the devisees, and his account may be settled in the Surrogate’s Court. (Decedent Estate Law, § 13; Matter of Coyne, 269 App. Div. 853; see, also, Matter of Burrows, 286 App. Div. 1092.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to settle the account of a successor executor in the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, an order was made on his motion, striking from the account the items relating to real estate and the management of real estate, and striking out the objections made to such items, on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction in respect of such issues. The decedent’s residuary estate, including his real property, vested in the devisees. After his appointment, the successor executor collected the rents, paid the expenses, and otherwise managed the real property. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to all parties filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate, and motion denied. The successor executor had the power to manage the real property notwithstanding that title thereto had vested in the devisees, and his account may be settled in the Surrogate’s Court. (Decedent Estate Law, § 13; Matter of Coyne, 269 App. Div. 853; see, also, Matter of Burrows, 286 App. Div. 1092.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 676, 146 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-langone-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack