In Re the Accounting of Klenk
108 N.E. 1098, 214 N.Y. 715, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1443
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo. JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Klenk, 108 N.E. 1098, 214 N.Y. 715, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1443 (N.Y. 1915).
108 N.E. 1098 (In Re the Accounting of Klenk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Filfiley
63 Misc. 2d 824 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1970)
Commrade v. Commrade
29 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Ohanian v. Ohanian
25 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Walsh v. Keenan
59 N.E.2d 409 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Bruff v. Trust
218 A.D. 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Matter of Neglia v. . Zimmerman
142 N.E. 442 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Bruff v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
118 Misc. 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)