In Re the Accounting of Keogh
79 N.E. 1107, 186 N.Y. 544, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1198
Opinion
Order affirmed on opinion below, with costs to each party appearing by separate attorney and filing briefs payable out of the estate.
Concur; Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Keogh, 79 N.E. 1107, 186 N.Y. 544, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1198 (N.Y. 1906).
79 N.E. 1107 (In Re the Accounting of Keogh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Meyer
140 Misc. 1 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)
In re the Accounting of Keogh
126 A.D. 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)