In Re the Accounting of Katz

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Accounting of Katz

193 N.E.2d 894, 13 N.Y.2d 924

DecidedOctober 10, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 193 N.E.2d 894 (In Re the Accounting of Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Accounting of Katz, 193 N.E.2d 894, 13 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed and appeal to the Appellate Division reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The letters submitted by appellants to the court objecting to provisions in respondents’ proposed order, regarding, among other things, the award of certain counsel fees included therein, is not such participation in the order making process as to come within People ex rel. Manhattan Stor. d Warehouse Co. v. Lilly (299 N. Y. 281), and Matter of Stern Bros. (Livingston) (2 A D *926 2d 553, affd. 3 N Y 2d 964), even though respondents’ order was so changed as to meet the objection embodied in appellants’ letter.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmokd and Judges Dye, Fuld, Yak Yoobhis, Burke, Foster and Scilepfi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed and appeal to the Appellate Division reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The letters submitted by appellants to the court objecting to provisions in respondents’ proposed order, regarding, among other things, the award of certain counsel fees included therein, is not such participation in the order making process as to come within People ex rel. Manhattan Stor. d Warehouse Co. v. Lilly (299 N. Y. 281), and Matter of Stern Bros. (Livingston) (2 A D *926 2d 553, affd. 3 N Y 2d 964), even though respondents’ order was so changed as to meet the objection embodied in appellants’ letter.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmokd and Judges Dye, Fuld, Yak Yoobhis, Burke, Foster and Scilepfi.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 N.E.2d 894, 13 N.Y.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-katz-ny-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack