In Re the Accounting of Holmes

68 N.E. 1118, 176 N.Y. 603, 14 Bedell 603, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 928

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Holmes, 68 N.E. 1118, 176 N.Y. 603, 14 Bedell 603, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 928 (N.Y. 1903).

Pincite

68 N.E. 1118 (In Re the Accounting of Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.