In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.

196 Misc. 995, 95 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3162
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided December 30, 1949·Published

Opinion

Collins, S.

Decedent’s will created a residuary trust for the benefit of her daughter who was granted a general power to appoint the trust remainder by her will. The income beneficiary died intestate and thus failed to exercise the power and question has arisen as to the disposition required to be made of the trust remainder under the circumstances. Decedent’s will lacks any provision disposing of the remainder in default of the exercise of the power by her daughter. The court holds that the trust principal is payable to the persons entitled to the intestate property of decedent on the date of decedent’s death. (Wright v. Wright, 225 N. Y. 329; Clark v. Cammann, 160 N. Y. 315; Doane v. Mercantile Trust Co., 160 N. Y. 494; Matter of Silsby, 229 N. Y. 396.) This result is required because of the complete omission of any indication in decedent’s will as to the disposition desired by her in the event the donee of the power failed or refused to exercise it. Since decedent attempted no gift of the property in the contingency that occurred, decisions construing particular text of other wills and canons of construction respecting the interpretation of testamentary language generally have no relevancy. In the case at bar intestacy does not result from the failure of an attempted gift. Neither is the property payable to the distributees of decedent perforce an explicit provision to that effect in the will, as was the fact in Beers v. Grant (110 App. Div. 152, affd. 185 N. Y. 533). The property of decedent passes in intestacy by operation of law solely because decedent failed in her will to make any disposition of it in default of the exercise of the power of appointment. (Matter of Toplitz, 191 App. Div. 477, affd. 234 N. Y. 556; Matter of Hayman, 134 Misc. 803, 809, affd. 229 App. Div. 853, affd. 256 N. Y. 557; Duff v. Rodenkirchen, 110 Misc. 575, affd. 193 App. Div. 898.)

Submit decree on notice construing the will and settling the account.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co., 196 Misc. 995, 95 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

196 Misc. 995 (In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doane v. . Mercantile Trust Co.
55 N.E. 296 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Wright v. . Wright
122 N.E. 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Beers v. . Grant
77 N.E. 1181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
In Re the Accounting of Rose
177 N.E. 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Clark v. . Cammann
54 N.E. 709 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Matter of Toplitz
138 N.E. 444 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
In Re the Accounting of Silsby
128 N.E. 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Beers v. Grant
110 A.D. 152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
In re Toplitz
191 A.D. 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Duff v. Fox
193 A.D. 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Duff v. Rodenkirchen
110 Misc. 575 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
In re the Estate of Hayman
134 Misc. 803 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)