In re the Accounting of Green

112 N.E.2d 774, 305 N.Y. 691, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Accounting of Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 305 N.Y. 148
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1953·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by the addition of the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz., whether section 269 of the Surrogate’s Court Act as here applied violated (1) article VI, clause 2, (2) article I, section 8, clause 3, (3) article II, section 2, clause 2, of the Federal Constitution, or (4) deprived appellant of property without due process in derogation of the Fourteenth Amend[692]*692ment of the Constitution. The Court of Appeals decided that that statute, as here invoked, did not violate any of the above provisions of the Constitution. [See 305 N. Y. 148.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Accounting of Green, 112 N.E.2d 774, 305 N.Y. 691, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1232 (N.Y. 1953).

112 N.E.2d 774 (In re the Accounting of Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Accounting of Green
111 N.E.2d 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)