In Re the Accounting of Friedsam
112 N.E. 1069, 217 N.Y. 680, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1455
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Cardozo, JJ. Dissenting on opinion .of Laughlin, J., below: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Seabury and Pound, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Friedsam, 112 N.E. 1069, 217 N.Y. 680, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1455 (N.Y. 1916).
112 N.E. 1069 (In Re the Accounting of Friedsam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Thompson
126 Misc. 91 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1925)
In re the Estate of Altman
115 Misc. 476 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1921)