In Re the Accounting of Farrell

92 N.E. 1084, 198 N.Y. 579, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 948
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 1910·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Chase, JJ.; Vann and Willard Bartlett, JJ., concur on the ground that the questions argued by appellant were not raised by exception.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Farrell, 92 N.E. 1084, 198 N.Y. 579, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 948 (N.Y. 1910).

92 N.E. 1084 (In Re the Accounting of Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Seidman
88 Misc. 2d 462 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1976)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of First Trust & Deposit Co.
245 A.D. 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
In re the Estate of Farrell
152 Misc. 118 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)