In Re the Accounting of Eyeington
16 N.E.2d 96, 278 N.Y. 543, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1389
Opinion
■ Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing by separate attorneys and filing briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Eyeington, 16 N.E.2d 96, 278 N.Y. 543, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1389 (N.Y. 1938).
16 N.E.2d 96 (In Re the Accounting of Eyeington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellingham v. Morton
116 A.D.2d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Alouisa
120 Misc. 2d 968 (New York County Courts, 1983)
United States v. Tucker
407 A.2d 1067 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Fisher v. Smith
319 F. Supp. 855 (W.D. Washington, 1970)
People v. Stevenson
23 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
People v. Stevenson
41 Misc. 2d 542 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
In re the Estate of Wilson
41 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
People v. Schneider
194 Misc. 746 (New York County Courts, 1949)
Nelson v. Sandkamp
34 N.W.2d 640 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1948)
In Re the Will of Gorham
28 N.E.2d 888 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)