In re the Accounting of Dropkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Accounting of Dropkin

8 A.D.2d 624, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 624 (In re the Accounting of Dropkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Accounting of Dropkin, 8 A.D.2d 624, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 79 of the Civil Practice Act, the appeal is from an order which (1) consolidated two files in the office of the clerk of the court under the title of this proceeding, (2) denied the motion to dismiss the objections to the accounting and inventory, and (3) referred the account as filed and the objections to a Special Referee to hear and determine, pursuant to section 1316 of the Civil Practice Act, insofar as said order denied the motion to dismiss the objections. The motion to dismiss the objections was made on the grounds that the objectant (respondent Gertrude Dropkin) is not the proper party in interest, and that the court had no jurisdiction to consider the objections in this proceeding. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 79 of the Civil Practice Act, the appeal is from an order which (1) consolidated two files in the office of the clerk of the court under the title of this proceeding, (2) denied the motion to dismiss the objections to the accounting and inventory, and (3) referred the account as filed and the objections to a Special Referee to hear and determine, pursuant to section 1316 of the Civil Practice Act, insofar as said order denied the motion to dismiss the objections. The motion to dismiss the objections was made on the grounds that the objectant (respondent Gertrude Dropkin) is not the proper party in interest, and that the court had no jurisdiction to consider the objections in this proceeding. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 624, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-dropkin-nyappdiv-1959.