In Re the Accounting of Doubleday

115 N.E. 1037, 220 N.Y. 590, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1039
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Doubleday, 115 N.E. 1037, 220 N.Y. 590, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1039 (N.Y. 1917).

115 N.E. 1037 (In Re the Accounting of Doubleday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Wilson
88 Misc. 2d 420 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1976)
In re the Estate of Long
144 Misc. 181 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)