In Re the Accounting of De Voe

77 N.E. 1185, 185 N.Y. 536, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 939
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 1906·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, witli costs to all parties appearing by counsel upon the argument to be paid out of the fund; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Edward T. Bartlett, J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of De Voe, 77 N.E. 1185, 185 N.Y. 536, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 939 (N.Y. 1906).

77 N.E. 1185 (In Re the Accounting of De Voe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of McKeon
25 Misc. 2d 850 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In Re the Will of Samson
178 N.E. 557 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
In re Van Gorden
233 A.D. 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
In re the Estate of Samson
139 Misc. 490 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)
In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Rowe
103 Misc. 111 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1918)
In re Polansky
14 Mills Surr. 349 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1915)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Prote
133 A.D. 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
In re Prote
118 N.Y.S. 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Peck
6 Mills Surr. 330 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1908)