Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Accounting of De Vany

In Re the Accounting of De Vany

98 N.E. 1106, 205 N.Y. 591, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1343
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 1912·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

*592 The decree of the surrogate and the order of the Appellate Division are reversed, without costs, in so far as they surcharge the account of the executor with the sum which he received from the legatee, Edith R. Gordon, and as to that item the claim of the executor is sustained, on the ground that the legatee, from whom the money was received by the executor, is the only person who has any interest in having the payment or gift set aside, and because the amount thus received by the executor can in no event become a part of the residuary estate; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch., J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, His cock and Collin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of De Vany, 98 N.E. 1106, 205 N.Y. 591, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1343 (N.Y. 1912).

98 N.E. 1106 (In Re the Accounting of De Vany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MTR. OF STORTECKY v. Mazzone
650 N.E.2d 391 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Stortecky v. Mazzone
156 Misc. 2d 16 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
In re the Estate of Veccio
49 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Estate of Penney
60 Misc. 2d 334 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1969)
In re the Estate of Hurewitz
174 Misc. 182 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
In re the Estate of Stumpp
153 Misc. 92 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)