In Re the Accounting of Curtis
126 N.E. 904, 228 N.Y. 534, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 989
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Curtis, 126 N.E. 904, 228 N.Y. 534, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 989 (N.Y. 1920).
126 N.E. 904 (In Re the Accounting of Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Bernstein
25 Misc. 2d 717 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Estate of Herbert
23 Misc. 2d 884 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1959)
Snow v. Snow
8 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Gough v. Frost
190 Misc. 927 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Viall v. Viall
261 A.D. 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Estate of Schnirman
167 Misc. 809 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
In re the Estate of McCoy
157 Misc. 281 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)